Yes, honey locust is generally considered good firewood, offering a hot, long burn and excellent coals. However, it's not without its drawbacks. The thorns present a significant challenge during harvesting and processing, and the dense wood can be tough to split.
While it delivers impressive heat, it's not quite as high BTU as some top performers like hickory or oak.
So, while honey locust makes a decent fuel source, the extra effort required might make other options more appealing depending on your circumstances and access to alternative wood types.
Key Takeaways:
- Honey locust is good firewood.
- It provides a hot, long-lasting burn and excellent coals.
- Its thorns can make harvesting and processing challenging.
- Black locust burns even hotter and longer than honey locust.
Table of Contents
Pros and Cons of Burning Honey Locust Firewood
Like any firewood, honey locust has its advantages and disadvantages. Weighing these pros and cons will help you decide if it's the right choice for your needs.
Pros of Locust Firewood
- High Heat Output: Honey locust generates significant heat, making it a good fuel source for warming your home or enjoying a roaring fire. It has a high BTU output with 26.7 million BTUs per cord.
- Long Burn Time: The dense wood burns slowly and steadily, providing long-lasting heat and reducing the frequency of needing to add more logs.
- Excellent Coals: Honey locust creates hot, long-lasting coals ideal for cooking, grilling, or extending the warmth of your fire.
- Relatively Common: In some regions, honey locust is a readily available species, potentially making it an affordable and accessible firewood option.
- Pleasant Aroma: The subtle, slightly sweet aroma adds a pleasant touch to the fireside ambiance without being overpowering.
Related: What Firewood Smells the Best: Our Top Choices
Cons of Locust Firewood
- Thorns: The sharp thorns on honey locust trees and branches pose a significant safety hazard during harvesting and processing. They require careful handling and protective gear.
- Difficult to Split: The dense and knotty wood can be challenging to split, even with a sharp axe or splitting maul. This can be time-consuming and physically demanding.
- Messy: The thorns, bark, and small branches can create a mess during handling and storage, requiring extra cleanup.
- Potential for Sparking: Honey locust can occasionally produce sparks, which can be a concern if you have an open fireplace or are burning it in a fire pit close to flammable materials.
- A fireplace screen is highly recommended.
- Longer Seasoning Time: The dense wood requires a longer seasoning period (12-18 months) compared to some other species, demanding more planning and storage space.
By carefully considering these pros and cons, you can decide whether honey locust firewood is the right fuel for your fireplace or wood stove.
Honey Locust vs. Other Popular Firewoods
How does honey locust stack up against other common firewood choices? This comparison will help you understand its relative strengths and weaknesses.
Honey Locust vs. Oak
Oak is a classic firewood choice known for its long burn time, excellent coals, and relatively low smoke. Compared to oak, honey locust burns similarly hot and produces equally good coals, potentially even burning a bit longer.
However, oak generally wins out in terms of ease of splitting and seasoning time. If splitting is a major concern, oak might be preferable.
Honey Locust vs. Hickory
Hickory is often considered the king of firewood, boasting the highest BTU output among common hardwoods. It burns hot, long, and creates excellent coals. While honey locust provides impressive heat, it doesn't quite match hickory's scorching temperatures.
However, honey locust might be slightly easier to split (though still challenging) and could be a more readily available option depending on your location.
Honey Locust vs. Maple
Maple is a popular choice due to its ease of splitting, clean burn, and decent heat output. While honey locust offers a hotter and longer burn than maple, its difficulty in splitting and longer seasoning time can make maple a more convenient option.
If ease of processing is a priority, maple is a good alternative, but for maximum heat, honey locust is the better choice.
Honey Locust vs. Cherry
Cherry burns with a beautiful flame and pleasant aroma, similar to honey locust. Both produce good coals and offer a medium burn time. However, cherry might be slightly easier to split.
The best choice between these two might depend on local availability and personal preference.
Honey Locust vs. Birch
Birch is known for its easy splitting and attractive bark, making it a popular choice for fireplaces. However, it doesn't burn as hot or as long as honey locust and produces less impressive coals.
If you prioritize convenience and aesthetics, birch might be appealing, but honey locust wins for heat and burn duration.
Honey Locust vs. Softer Woods (Pine, Fir)
Compared to softer woods like pine or fir, honey locust is significantly superior in terms of heat output, burn time, and coaling qualities. Softer woods burn quickly and produce more smoke, while honey locust provides a slow, steady burn with substantial heat and excellent coals.
The ease of splitting softer woods is their primary advantage, but if heat and efficiency are your goals, honey locust is the clear winner.
More Articles for You: